Background Image
Previous Page  11 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

11

Must the show go on?

Angela McPake Chairman A&WMTC

Everyone agreed that our 2010

production of Mack and Mabel

was a great artistic triumph. It

was also the show that very nearly

bought the curtain down on a

society that had been in existence

for 60 years. A combination of

expensive staging, spiralling

costs in every direction and poor

ticket sales (we sold 45% of the

seats: a new low for us even in the

recession) meant we lost £12,000

on the production. We only had

£10,000 in the bank.

A crisis meeting was called, open

to everyone who had an interest,

whether or not they were current

members. Our long standing

Chairman, Bob Chaloner

explained the predicament and

outlined the options; fundraise to

clear the debt and get money in

the bank for future productions

or fold the society. We also had

a number of vacancies on the

committee of Management,

and this was putting pressure

on the other members so we

agreed before the meeting that

we also needed to fill those

roles to be able to continue.

The meeting was well attended

and there was a really strong

sense that we should find a way

to carry on. There were some

huge positives to come out of

the meeting- new committee

members (past members, parents

of past members and someone

who was aware how much one of

her friends enjoyed being involved

and wanted to help) and some

great fundraising ideas. There

were also people there who were

very passionate about our carrying

on but whom we haven’t seen

since (fundraising or working on a

production) which is an enduring

frustration!

With additional committee

members, we started work. One

of our new members worked in

marketing and was passionate

about ‘our brand’ and appealing to

a younger audience- both as cast

and, well, audience. So came a

new name- we became a Musical

Theatre Company rather than

an Operatic Society. Would we

have changed our name without

the problems we were having?

Undoubtedly not, but the issues

made us review everything we did

and gave us a chance to change

things. We had a new logo created

that we use on everything we do.

A new presence on Facebook and

Twitter and a revamped website

all followed. There were lots of

conversations about brand values

and company culture at committee

meetings- definitely mind-blowing

for some of our older members!

The major focus, though, was

fundraising. We had members who

did all sorts of sponsored activity-

cycle rides, runs and any manner

of other physical feats. We had

fundraising events of every hue,

became experts at things you can

collect and sell- clothes, mobile

phones, wire, ink cartridges and

CDs to name a few, and started

raising the profile of the Company

by appearing at local events,

markets and shopping centres and

shaking money tins as we went.

Despite being in existence for

more than 60 years, it was a huge

shock to realise how few people

knew we existed even in our own

home town. There was, though, an

enormous outpouring of goodwill

which meant that people, who had

previously had no involvement,

were prepared to help us or point

us towards possible sources of

funding.

Although we had agreed that

we wouldn’t mount a production

until we had enough money in the

bank, a year in and enthusiasm

was beginning to wane as it felt

as though we would never hit the

target. We decided we needed a

focus and agreed that we would

commit to doing a show the

following year and make sure we

got to our fundraising target before

the show went on.

Deciding on the right show

was crucial. We needed it to

be relatively easy to stage and,

above all, at the cheaper end of

the scale. For the first time (I

am embarrassed to admit) we

employed all those techniques we

used at work but had never really

transferred to our hobby. Once we

had a short list of shows that we

believed we could afford, we did

some market research. We actually

asked local residents what they

would want to see and how much

they would be prepared to pay for

a ticket. We ended up with two

clear favourites, for one of which

we were then denied the rights, so

this narrowed the choice to one!

Before we committed to the show

we drew up a detailed budget.

Previously, the Treasurer had done

that job, based on the previous

year’s costs, meaning that the only

person who really felt committed

to the budget was he. This time,

the budget was compiled by

the people who spent most

of the money - the Chairman,

the Treasurer, the Production

Secretary, the Stage Manager and

the Wardrobe Mistress. Speaking

as one of the group, it certainly

focuses you on what you have

to spend and on sticking to the

budget. Despite our need to

watch costs, the Marketing team

produced a Marketing plan and

we committed roughly 8% of our

total budget to marketing the show.

This was a first for us, as it was

never really seen as that important

- which is perhaps why so many

people didn’t know we existed.

Despite careful budgeting, it was

still going to cost us over £1000

per person to put each cast member

on stage (by the simple sum of

dividing the total cost by the

number of cast). A scary statistic

when you are so focused on cost!

It wasn’t all about money

though, and last May we started

rehearsals for Boogie Nights. Not

a great piece of theatre but it could

be done on one set, had a small

orchestra, we could costume it

ourselves with the help of EBay

and even people who didn’t think

they ‘did’ musical theatre knew the

music in it. It was also a fun show

and hopefully would be enjoyed by

new cast members. It turned out

that we had one of the best shows

ever, because of a great cast who

helped create a great atmosphere

on stage and off.

Some of our cast had stayed

with us during our fundraising

year but lots hadn’t and we had

had to find new members. Some

of those new members have been

great and a number are now on

our committee. It is quite hard for

everyone though, when you have

a big influx of new committee

members. There are lots of things

you just know about if you have

been around amateur theatre

for any time. If you are new to

it, you don’t, so you need to be

prepared for lots of explaining.

New members also bring a new

perspectives, which is brilliant,

but it is sometimes difficult not

to take searching questions as

a criticism of what we have

done before. I do think we are

a stronger group for those new

members and new enthusiasm.

We finished

Boogie Nights

at

a break-even point, having had

a Community Support grant that

just covered the modest loss we

actually sustained. Considering

the £12,000 loss on the previous

show, we considered that a major

achievement.

Fundraising continues apace

as part of what we do in the

normal run of things. There are

still challenges for us, as for most

other theatre groups. Our core

audience is getting older, there is

lots of competition for the limited

money in people’s pockets, so

getting a big enough audience is

challenging. We only have one

theatre (using the term loosely)

large enough in our area - so we

have to pay the amount the council

demands in rent and there is

nothing to help us push the costs

down. Potential cast members are

hard to find as they have lots of

pressures on their time and most

committee members work full

time these days and fit our musical

theatre jobs around everything else

happening in our lives! Despite

those challenges though, we are

more committed than ever to

carrying on and are much more

business focused than we ever

were before. We certainly don’t

take our company for granted and

feel lucky to be able to do what we

love- most of the time, at least!

In November we are producing

Singin’ in the Rain

. Our newest

challenge, therefore, involves lots

of water!